Answers have to stay inside Estonian law and EU law, and those sources can conflict.

Live at estlaw.stepinbooking.com. Answers are planned in Estonian, English, and Russian.

• Structured Estonian law from Riigi Teataja, plus 33,114 EU acts from EUR-Lex.
• A source hierarchy resolves conflicts: EU law → Constitution → treaties → acts → regulations.
• Agentic tree-RAG: act cards → section maps → provision summaries → full text.
• Daily update pipeline: sha256 diff, only changed acts re-queued, stable IDs.
• Answers planned in Estonian, English, and Russian.

• Bulk summarisation split into 1,653 validated, hash-checked work units.
• Coding agents ran those units across several machines, with progress tracking, validators, and cost caps.

The statute archive had to be digitised before it could be searched, and bad file naming had silently dropped documents from the government dataset.

Private repositories. No public link.

• Digitised the statute archive: Go downloader, Rust PDF-to-image, OCR enhancement, and human-in-the-loop review.
• Proposed a naming standard and a data-readiness review after the dropped documents came to light.
• RAG chatbot using OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and Claude via OpenRouter, with a KeyDB cache, Docker, and AWS.
• Swedish-to-English law-XML translation, with highlighted source passages.
• Successor: embedding-free agentic RAG over 5,236 in-force Finnish laws.

• Human-in-the-loop review of the digitised archive.
• A naming standard and a data-readiness review for the government dataset.

Drafting legislation in two languages needs structure, amendment tracking, and a controlled path from draft to approved text.

No public link.

• Structured editing for metadata, chapters, and paragraphs, with amendment tracking and validation.
• Live XML preview and export.
• An approved-versus-draft workflow with four-eyes (two-person) approval.

• Validation on the draft.
• Four-eyes approval: two people sign off before a draft is treated as approved.

Detect defects on printed circuit boards and give repair guidance.

Winner — Mirka M.INC Innovation Challenge (Finland). Live at aielectronics.vercel.app. The funding pitch was for up to €20k in the first phase.

• Took it through problem validation, proof of value, and customer interviews.
• Pitched for up to €20k in first-phase funding.

• Problem validation, proof of value, and customer interviews before the funding pitch.